Comparison

Core Web Vitals vs PageSpeed Performance Score

Understand the difference between Core Web Vitals and PageSpeed performance scores. Learn which metrics actually affect your Google rankings and SEO performance.

Core Web Vitals

SEO rankings and real-world user experience measurement

5 pros4 cons

PageSpeed Performance Score

Development optimization and quick performance assessment

5 pros4 cons

Detailed Comparison

Core Web Vitals Pros

Directly used in Google rankings
Based on real user data (CrUX)
Three focused metrics (LCP, CLS, INP)
Clear pass/fail thresholds
Industry standard for user experience

PageSpeed Performance Score Pros

Immediate feedback on any URL
Comprehensive 0-100 scoring
Includes multiple metrics weighted together
Good for development feedback
Available without traffic requirements

Core Web Vitals Cons

Requires sufficient traffic for field data
28-day rolling average (slow to update)
Only three metrics
May miss other performance issues

PageSpeed Performance Score Cons

Not directly used in Google rankings
Lab-based (may not reflect real users)
Score can fluctuate between tests
Can be misleading for SEO priorities

Our Verdict

Core Web Vitals directly affect Google rankings and should be your primary SEO focus. The PageSpeed score is useful for development but doesn't directly impact rankings. Prioritize passing Core Web Vitals thresholds over chasing a perfect PageSpeed score.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. The PageSpeed score is not a ranking factor. You can have a 100 score with failing Core Web Vitals or a 70 score with passing CWV. Google ranks based on Core Web Vitals field data, not the lab-based performance score.

Not entirely. Use it as a development tool and quick health check. A very low score often indicates problems. But don't obsess over the number - focus on passing Core Web Vitals thresholds and providing good user experience.

PageSpeed scores use lab data (simulated tests) while Core Web Vitals use field data (real user measurements). Lab tests are consistent but may not reflect real-world conditions. Field data shows actual user experience across different devices and networks.

Core Web Vitals are a ranking factor but one of many. Content relevance and quality remain primary factors. However, among pages with similar content quality, better Core Web Vitals can provide a ranking advantage. It's a tiebreaker, not a dominant factor.

More Comparisons

CDN vs No CDN: Impact on Website Performance and SEO

Compare websites with and without a CDN. Learn how Content Delivery Networks affect load times, Core Web Vitals, and SEO rankings for different use cases.

Static vs Dynamic Rendering for SEO: Which is Better?

Compare static site generation and dynamic rendering for SEO. Learn how SSG, SSR, and ISR affect Core Web Vitals, crawlability, and search rankings.

Lighthouse vs PageSpeed Insights: What's the Difference?

Understand the differences between Google Lighthouse and PageSpeed Insights. Learn when to use each tool and how they relate to your Core Web Vitals scores.

Lighthouse vs GTmetrix: Which Performance Testing Tool is Better?

Compare Google Lighthouse and GTmetrix for website performance testing. See which tool offers better Core Web Vitals analysis, waterfall charts, and actionable recommendations for your site.

Discover the best bulk SEO tools for auditing multiple URLs simultaneously. Compare tools for bulk performance testing, Core Web Vitals checks, and large-scale site audits.

Mobile Performance Optimization Guide

Optimize your website for mobile devices. Covers responsive design, mobile-first development, touch optimization, and mobile Core Web Vitals.

How to Improve Interaction to Next Paint (INP)

Learn how to optimize Interaction to Next Paint (INP) for better responsiveness. Covers JavaScript optimization, event handling, and reducing input delay.

Test Your Site with BulkAudit

Get instant performance scores and see how your site compares.

Start Free Audit